This page is for information purposes only. Certain services and features may not be available in your jurisdiction.

Arca’s Fallout with Circle: A Crypto Betrayal or Strategic Misstep?

Introduction: The Arca-Circle Rift

Arca, one of the earliest backers of Circle, has publicly severed ties with the stablecoin issuer following a controversial allocation process during Circle’s recent initial public offering (IPO). The fallout has sparked heated debates within the crypto community, raising questions about the alignment of interests between crypto-native firms and traditional financial institutions (TradFi).

Circle’s IPO: A Milestone for Crypto

Circle, the issuer of USDC, the world’s second-largest stablecoin, made its public debut on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on June 5 under the ticker CRCL. The IPO raised $1.05 billion, with shares surging 167% on the first day of trading, closing at $82. By June 6, the stock had climbed further to $115 per share during intraday trading. This marked a significant milestone for the crypto industry, as Circle gained access to traditional finance’s deepest capital markets.

Arca’s Discontent: A “Measly” Allocation

Despite Circle’s successful IPO, Arca’s Chief Investment Officer, Jeff Dorman, expressed outrage over the allocation process. Arca had placed an order for $10 million in Circle shares but received only $135,000 worth—a mere 1.35% of its request. Dorman criticized Circle for favoring TradFi mutual funds and hedge funds over crypto-native firms, calling the allocation “a joke.”

Key Points from Dorman’s Open Letter

  • Neglect of Crypto-Native Firms: Dorman accused Circle of prioritizing traditional financial institutions that likely have no wallets and will never use Circle’s products.

  • Betrayal of Early Supporters: Arca, a long-time supporter of Circle and USDC, felt sidelined despite its contributions to the stablecoin’s growth and resilience during crises.

  • Closing Accounts: Arca announced it would close all accounts with Circle and discourage other firms from partnering with the stablecoin issuer.

The Broader Implications for Crypto

The controversy surrounding Circle’s IPO allocation highlights deeper issues within the crypto industry. Dorman’s criticism underscores the tension between crypto-native firms and TradFi institutions, as well as the challenges of maintaining alignment of interests in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.

Alignment of Interests: A Missed Opportunity

Dorman emphasized the importance of rewarding early supporters and aligning interests to foster long-term growth. He pointed to successful examples like Binance and Axie Infinity, where alignment between founders, employees, customers, and investors has driven satisfaction and success. Circle’s decision to favor TradFi institutions over crypto-native firms, he argued, was a short-sighted move that undermines the industry’s core values.

Circle’s Perspective: Silence Amid Criticism

As of publication, Circle has not publicly responded to Dorman’s accusations. The company’s decision to allocate shares to TradFi institutions may have been driven by strategic considerations, such as ensuring strong demand and liquidity for its IPO. However, the lack of transparency and communication has fueled frustration among crypto-native stakeholders.

What’s Next for Arca and Circle?

Arca’s decision to sever ties with Circle and shift to rival stablecoins like USDT raises questions about the future of USDC’s adoption and Circle’s reputation within the crypto community. The upcoming 13F filings will reveal the institutional investors who benefited from Circle’s IPO, potentially shedding light on the company’s allocation strategy.

FAQs

Why did Arca sever ties with Circle?

Arca’s Chief Investment Officer, Jeff Dorman, criticized Circle for favoring TradFi institutions over crypto-native firms during its IPO allocation process. Arca received only 1.35% of its requested shares, prompting the firm to close its accounts with Circle.

What is the significance of Circle’s IPO?

Circle’s IPO marked a major milestone for the crypto industry, as the issuer of USDC gained access to traditional finance’s capital markets. The IPO raised $1.05 billion, with shares surging on the first day of trading.

How does this controversy impact USDC?

Arca’s decision to stop accepting USDC and shift to rival stablecoins like USDT could impact USDC’s adoption and Circle’s reputation within the crypto community.

What are the broader implications for the crypto industry?

The controversy highlights the tension between crypto-native firms and TradFi institutions, as well as the challenges of maintaining alignment of interests in the industry.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for Crypto

The Arca-Circle fallout serves as a wake-up call for the crypto industry, emphasizing the need for transparency, alignment of interests, and mutual respect between stakeholders. As the industry continues to evolve, the lessons from this controversy could shape future interactions between crypto-native firms and TradFi institutions.

Disclaimer
This content is provided for informational purposes only and may cover products that are not available in your region. It is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or an investment recommendation; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold crypto/digital assets, or (iii) financial, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Crypto/digital asset holdings, including stablecoins, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding crypto/digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professional for questions about your specific circumstances. Information (including market data and statistical information, if any) appearing in this post is for general information purposes only. While all reasonable care has been taken in preparing this data and graphs, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors of fact or omission expressed herein.

© 2025 OKX. This article may be reproduced or distributed in its entirety, or excerpts of 100 words or less of this article may be used, provided such use is non-commercial. Any reproduction or distribution of the entire article must also prominently state: “This article is © 2025 OKX and is used with permission.” Permitted excerpts must cite to the name of the article and include attribution, for example “Article Name, [author name if applicable], © 2025 OKX.” Some content may be generated or assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. No derivative works or other uses of this article are permitted.

Related articles

View more
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

How to Read Crypto Derivatives Order Books

Introduction Crypto derivatives order books are indispensable tools for traders, offering real-time data that can shape trading strategies and decision-making. These order books provide insights into bid-ask prices, trading volume, open interest, implied volatility, and Greeks—metrics that are crucial for navigating the fast-paced world of crypto derivatives markets.
Jul 10, 2025
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

The Rise of Crypto Derivatives: Market Size & Growth

Introduction to the Cryptocurrency Derivatives Market in 2025 The cryptocurrency derivatives market is undergoing unprecedented growth, with projections estimating an annual trading volume of over $23 trillion by the end of 2025. This surge highlights the increasing maturity of the crypto ecosystem, driven by institutional adoption, innovative trading products, and evolving market dynamics. In this article, we delve into the trends shaping the derivatives market, including Bitcoin’s dominance, the rise of decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and the impact of regulatory developments.
Jul 10, 2025
trends_flux2
Altcoin
Trending token

Understanding Funding Rates in Perpetual Futures Contracts

Understanding Funding Rates in Perpetual Futures Contracts Funding rates are a pivotal mechanism in perpetual futures contracts, ensuring price alignment between futures and spot markets. Unlike traditional futures contracts, perpetual futures lack an expiration date, making funding rates essential for maintaining market equilibrium.
Jul 10, 2025