UXLINK price

📢Authenticity, the common language of social finance Boxing training is not just about conditioning the body. It confronts us with the essence of human nature through countless repetitive movements. And those who overcome that nature and grow are extremely rare. As the 80/20 rule shows, in any group, only a few genuinely overcome their instincts and pursue their essence. The majority, occupying the 80, choose comfort and instinctively accept only information that benefits them, trying to justify it. However, true growth begins with the will to understand and overcome this instinct. Just as one must sweat and repeat the same movements thousands of times in boxing to create a single victory in the ring, training to control psychological instincts is necessary in investment, relationships, and life as a whole. This philosophy may resonate with the spirit of social finance like UXLINK @UXLINKofficial. Rather than chasing the masses, we should create authentic connections, build long-term trust over short-term temptations, and share real value that can be acted upon rather than just flashy information. Social finance should not be a mere reward system; it must start from a collective will to acknowledge and overcome the limitations of human nature. The goal of social finance should be this 'trained connection.' We need to create a space for that training. Just as thousands of jabs in the ring lead to victory, countless authentic actions will ultimately complete a new network of trust, the ecosystem of social finance.

UXLINK: Making EIP-7702 a tangible "distribution infrastructure," the next step is to clarify "social equals trust" in the United States. Many projects treat "account abstraction" as a technical selling point, while @UXLINKofficial seems to be translating it into an experiential promise that everyone can relate to: one account, unified Gas, and minimal friction. This year, the team has clearly migrated from ERC-4337 to EIP-7702, temporarily smartening traditional EOAs within a single transaction window. The core idea is to simplify complex contract interactions into one phrase: one-click completion. This is not just a slogan—they also provide a path for the "dual-core contract" implementation (UX7702Delegator and UX7702ValidatorProxy), reducing user interaction steps and Gas costs through batch calls and proxy mechanisms, truly delivering a "no-configuration experience" to ordinary users. For most newcomers, whether they "feel like they are on-chain" is far more important than the abstract paradigms behind it. If we view "usability" as the entry point, two studies from Messari provide a broader framework: UXLINK is not just a single SocialFi application, but is building a "Social Growth Layer" as a growth infrastructure—its foundation includes the ONE Chain, One Account/One Gas protocol, and a set of social growth protocols, layered with AI Agents to productize education, outreach, customer service, and retention, which are all "heavy operational actions." In other words, it attempts to shorten the path of "acquisition—conversion—transaction signing" into a smooth chain, reducing every friction point that could deter newcomers. This perspective also explains why 7702 is particularly critical for them: when accounts are smartened in a short time window, many "view once—click once—complete" loops become realistically feasible. The narrative aimed at the U.S. market is also becoming clearer. On August 11 of this year, UXLINK announced its entry into the U.S., and the strategy is not just to continue airdropping in a different region, but to place the "social + AI user operation engine" within a more compliant and localized framework. Whether the "Telegram social mining + super DApp entry" model that has worked in Asia and Africa can be accepted by roles such as regulation, payment, and custody in North America will determine when the second inflection point of the curve appears. In terms of data metrics, CMC's recent updates have also clarified this node and direction: landing in the U.S. is seen as the core exam question for future growth and compliance. The underlying logic of "social equals trust" is a theme that UXLINK has repeatedly emphasized in its English materials over the past few months. In traditional finance, trust is underpinned by banks, brokers, and clearing houses; in a decentralized environment, the greatest uncertainty in cold starts is actually "why should I trust, why should I use it?" The team's recent English article directly elevates this question to the level of "distribution": when relationship graphs and reputations are verifiable, the entry education for RWA and stablecoins, KYC lead generation, and compliance outreach can roll out at a lower cost and higher conversion within a vast but "cold" population. Thus, UXLINK is not just creating social products, but is using social to bear the responsibility of "trustworthy distribution." The collaboration with R2USD is a practical annotation of this narrative. RWA's yield products inherently require a mechanism design that "encourages ordinary people to take the first step," and the shortest path often comes from the word-of-mouth diffusion of trusted relationships. The combination of R2 and UXLINK directly aims to package the experience of real-world yields for a broader audience: first addressing outreach, then discussing long-term retention. For a project attempting to prove its "social distribution capability," this is a paradigm that is more understandable in the U.S. context. The supply-side narrative needs to be faced honestly. Over the past year, after UXLINK entered its TGE anniversary, discussions around unlocking have continuously emerged: the nearly 10% increase in mid-July and subsequent rhythm will objectively test the market's absorption capacity. More importantly, it is crucial to bind the release curve with user milestones, real transactions, and compliant deposits, allowing the "growth and release" constraint mechanism to be externally verifiable. This is precisely the orientation that KOLs should emphasize in the U.S. narrative: honest disclosure of short-term volatility and long-term binding proven by data. The current objective metrics are: a total of 1 billion, with a circulating supply of about 480 million; using each "verifiable growth metric" to cover each "predictable release event" is a two-way exam question for both the project party and the market.