Alright, I drew a picture on how this works and why it's different // a net-new model.
Freshest-possible pricing, efficient tx initiation (only done when needed), and onchain composability.
Wins everywhere.
For reference, this is how traditional pull oracles work with the same outlined work being required:
- [1] Must include the work done from [2]
- [2] Work is added to dev's workload
- [4] isn't possible or available to non-Euphoria contracts as the pricing data is only known to the initiating app from [1]
- [5] is dependent on the app implementation, whereas it's ~always optimal for a native implementation
As @ChainLinkGod called it, this is "value-added frontrunning."
Few teams are leaning in to the superpower of a sequencer construction. We'll maximize it.

For visual completeness, here's how a pull oracle works otherwise:

47.15K
337
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.