Why @KeetaNetwork $KTA might not be just another L1 🤔 10M+ TPS with sub-second finality is almost too good to be true... but what if? We’ve seen dozens of L1s, L2s, and sidechains, with mostly same tech, forks of forks... Keeta’s twist: Each account runs its own mini-blockchain, syncing smoothly for high speed (tested at 13M TPS on Google Cloud vs Solana’s ~65K theoretical tps). To be as direct as possible: (1) no mempools; (2) client-directed validation skips the queue; (3) 2-phase voting ensures speed/security; and (4) cloud-native, scaling linearly with serverless tech. 👇 We can break it down to understand how this works: 1⃣ Most blockchains use a "mempool" (a waiting room where transactions sit before getting processed). This can slow things down, especially when network is busy. Keeta skips this entirely and transactions go straight to validation; 2⃣ Normally, validators (network helpers) pick and process transactions from the mempool. In Keeta, you send your transaction directly to these helpers (or "representatives") to check it; thus, no mempool needed; 3⃣ Two-step check: representatives give a quick "looks good" (temporary vote). If enough agree, they lock it in (permanent vote); 4⃣ Keeta runs on big cloud systems (like Google Cloud or AWS) using "serverless" tech, which can be increased as network demand scales. 🚨 As with anything, this model also has negatives to it: - Reliance on centralised cloud providers (many issues can come from this); - No real tests to ensure metrics are valid; - Small team (for now). Still, if they pulls this off, it won’t be just another L1. Do you guys think Keeta can actually deliver on its promises? Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts about it!