The biggest problem in the circle is not that there are "too few projects," but rather— the vast majority of projects rely on talk, not on math. They depend on emotions, narratives, and FOMO. Once the mainnet goes live, inflation explodes, liquidity evaporates, and incentive loops fail directly, leaving behind users who entered the market. This is exactly where @almanak wants to take action. What it does can be summed up in one sentence: It allows project teams to run their token economic models through a "digital truth machine" before the TGE, not just theoretical deductions on paper, but using real on-chain data + behavioral logic stress testing. The issues it can simulate in advance include: 🔹 Will the selling pressure directly break through when a certain release curve starts? 🔹 Will the incentive loop fail under extreme market conditions? 🔹 Can the LP pool withstand large shocks and automatic arbitrage? 🔹 Which design will lead to a structural collapse in 6 months? The core significance is very direct: It’s better for errors to explode in the sandbox than in the secondary market. Where is the value for us investors? You don’t have to judge whether a project is a makeshift operation based on "feelings." If a team is willing to run the model thoroughly, revise it, and validate it in such an environment, at least it shows— it’s not the kind of team that treats real funds as experimental subjects. What’s even more intense is that Almanak also introduces an AI agent system, it doesn’t just run once, but continuously iterates the model, allowing the design to converge towards stability and sustainability. I also noticed a detail: they proactively postponed the TGE— to me, this is a positive signal: they won’t go live on the mainnet until it’s stable, which resembles a project that is responsible for its economic system. Web3 must shift from "Vibes-driven" to "Data-validated" to enter the next era. Almanak belongs to that category of infrastructure projects that brings the future closer.