cosmic brett price

휴 아직 22위!!! (일희일비 끝판왕) Proof Link, Link-to-Earn, Web3 Onboarding 까지, Web3 초반의 모든 부분을 책임지고 있는 UXLINK! 아무래도 힙한 @UXLINKofficial 와 @KaitoAI 의 만남으로 열심히 해왔는데요, 4일남은 지금 한국분들 모두 마지막까지 화이팅하시길 바라용 :) UXLINK is cool and it has a lot of Web3 onboarding processes :)

Explore, @0G_labs and @anoma two projects, each with its own unique design, suitable for different application scenarios. @0G_labs More technical infrastructure, performance wins: It is a modular Layer 1 built for on-chain AI, with fast speed, low cost, and high throughput. It can be used for on-chain AI model training, storage, and inference, and is suitable for generative AI, video, images, text, etc. It is particularly friendly to DeFi, DeSci, GameFi, and content platforms because of its strong performance, EVM compatibility, simple deployment, and cheap operation. It is the kind of infrastructure that favors "hard-core technology + high-performance computing", which is suitable for data-intensive applications. @anoma More user experience and privacy protection: Its core is "intent-oriented + privacy + cross-chain", just like you say "I want to buy BTC with USDC", it will help you automate the complex operations on the entire chain. Privacy is very strong, supporting ZK technology, and maintaining privacy when transferring across chains. DeFi applications for non-technical users, lowering the barrier to entry. It also supports multi-chain communication (like the Cosmos ecosystem), which is more suitable for scenarios that require multiple chains to work together. It is also possible to do decentralized identity and social networking, with a focus on privacy first. The last of the last @0G_labs is more suitable for application scenarios that require high-performance computing and data processing, especially on-chain AI, GameFi, and high-throughput DeFi. Its modular architecture and low-cost storage give it a unique advantage in AI-powered Web3 applications. @anoma is more suitable for scenarios that require privacy protection, cross-chain interoperability, and user-friendly interactions, such as privacy DeFi, cross-chain marketplaces, and decentralized social. Its intent-centric design significantly reduces the complexity of using the blockchain. The goals of the two are different, one is "technical bottom", and the other is "user experience + privacy", each with its own merits. @0G_labs @anoma Stay tuned.

절대 지켜 22위!!!(Feat. 3일 남음) 이제 진짜 조금만 더 힘내면 되겠네요 :) 저포함 많은 분들이 많이 지텼지만 이제까지 올심히 했는데, 봇한테 질수는 없죠?! Group-to-Earn 으로 한국인 분들 어깨 뽝 걸고 같이 Web3 Onboarding 부터 Link-to-Earn 으로 시작해 proof of Link, PayFi 의 Fuji Card 까지 쭈욱 달려보시죱 :) I believe in UXLINK, and it's PayFi the Fuji Card!

Why is @anoma so popular, comparative analysis with other projects, and what are the similarities and dissimilarities of @anoma compared to other projects? Similar to Cosmos • Both use the Tendermint consensus, and the technical kinship is very deep. • They all want to engage in "multi-chain interoperability" to solve the problem of information incompatibility between chains. • The difference is that Anoma pays more attention to "user intent", for example, you only say "I want to change A to B", and the system handles the rest; Cosmos, on the other hand, is more of a toolbox for developers to build blocks. Bottom line: Anoma can be seen as an enhanced version of Cosmos, with more privacy and more goofy user interactions. Similar to Ethereum • Can run decentralized applications. • All have their own concept of "virtual machine" (Anoma is an Intent Machine, ETH is an EVM). • The difference is: Ethereum is operation-driven, you have to fill in gas, and there are many operation steps; Anoma, on the other hand, is "what I want", which can be automatically matched, and the experience is more silky. • In terms of privacy, Ethereum is transparent by default and requires plugins to be private, while Anoma is "built-in privacy". Bottom line: Anoma is like a more user-friendly, privacy-preserving version of Ethereum. Similar to Zcash • Both attach importance to transaction privacy and use zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) technology. • All have the concept of "shielded pools" to hide assets. • The difference: Zcash is a private payment system; Anoma is a "privacy all-in-one platform" that can do a lot of things. Bottom line: Anoma doesn't just hide money, it also wants to help you do more Web3 operations in a private way. Similar to Polkadot • Both emphasize multi-chain interoperability, and the structure is relatively modular. • Polkadot connects the ecosystem with a relay chain + parachain; Anoma uses its own system of intentions to coordinate multiple chains. • The difference is: Polkadot is more technical and has weak privacy features; Anoma is more user-friendly, with privacy as standard. Summary: Polkadot is the translator between chains, and Anoma is the intelligent secretary of "you speak, the system does it for you". Similar to Namada • Namada is actually a member of the Anoma family, specializing in private transfers. • The technology of the two is the same, both use ZKP and multi-asset shielded pools. • The difference: Namada focuses on "hidden assets"; Anoma is the "brain" that orchestrates more complex requirements. Summary: Namada is Anoma's "privacy wallet brother", and Anoma is the "brain and operating system" of the entire system. The last of the last @anoma integrates the cross-chain of Cosmos, the smart contracts of Ethereum, the privacy of Zcash, and the modular design of Polkadot, but also has its own original "intent-driven" system that allows users to operate the blockchain like "making a wish", with the goal of making Web3 as easy and secure as using WeChat. So that's the answer to the question at the beginning of the article. It's just too rolly. Come on brothers, stay tuned. 👍

#MetaEarth is building where #Web3 meets real-world impact from daily rewards to on-chain identity. Explore how the #MENetwork is driving meaningful adoption across the globe. 🌍 Full story on @Investingcom 👀👇