amm.pump.fun price

Now tracking @BlackholeDex on @avax Blackhole is a decentralized exchange built on Avalanche

.@celestia with @dYdX I've been completely hooked on the "CLOBs on Blobd" narrative lately — so naturally, I aped into a $TIA position on the best decentralized perp DEX out there: dYdX. My Yapfing bounty challenge isn't over yet. Still going strong 🫡 Oh and btw, deposits on dYdX? Insanely fast. And free. Got any thoughts on my position?

Could Celestia's CLOB be the savior of $TIA? The narrative that the Celestia team has been emphasizing lately is "CLOBs On blobs". What does this phrase mean if we break it down? A Blob is a unit for storing and processing data in Celestia, and this Blob allows rollups to publish and validate data. Simply put, it’s Celestia's way of efficiently storing and sharing rollup data. CLOB can be thought of as a CEX. It’s fast and efficient, but implementing a CLOB on the blockchain in a DeFi environment has been too inefficient, leading to the use of AMMs as an alternative. So, if we combine these ideas? It means that Celestia aims to realize a CEX's CLOB system on the blockchain using its Blob (DA). CLOB needs to process a massive amount of transaction data quickly, and at this point, Celestia's Blob helps store this data and allows for immediate processing on rollups or other layers. Personally, I wondered if this is something only Celestia can do. Can’t Avail or Eigenlayer do it? However, according to DSRV Emperor's content, Celestia is the only one that can realistically support an on-chain order book with its DA. So, who is using this? Perp DEX @hibachi_xyz has introduced Celestia's CLOBs On blobs through the Wynn upgrade. (With @SuccinctLabs) Now, let’s return to $TIA. As more DeFi protocols adopt CLOBs On blobs, The demand for Celestia DA will increase, And as demand rises, the consumption of $TIA will increase. However, the $TIA received as Blob fees will return to validators and stakers. Of course, they say they will introduce a fee-burning model in the future and significantly reduce inflation through the next major upgrade. And although it's late, they also plan to lock up interest on the locked $TIA through the upgrade. As retail investors, $TIA is more important to us than Celestia, but could CLOBs On blobs be the savior of $TIA?

If I read Charizard's post and wrote down what I thought.. In fact, when I first saw @Mira_Network, I thought of an 'orderbook-based perp DEX' like dydx v2 that records only the results on-chain after an off-chain operation. It seemed similar in that most of the computation was performed off-chain and only the results and deposited capital changes were recorded on-chain. Of course, in the case of order book-type perp DEX, the deposited capital is the center, and the main purpose of off-chain computation is order book-based transactions. In the case of Mira Network, the deposited capital is only used for compensation or slashing of Verifier nodes. It seems that the 'main purpose' of off-chain computation is the process of inference and sharding. This process has nothing to do with the deposited capital. However, the method of storing off-chain results on-chain was mostly centralized in the case of order book-based perp DEXs, In the case of Mira, as you said, it is very similar to the PoS consensus process in the blockchain. In this aspect, is it more blockchain than the old DApps? I think it makes me think abstractly haha So, as you mentioned in the article, Mira is a project that borrows the approach of blockchain in the AI industry and brings us one step closer to mass adoption. In addition, just as perp DEX has evolved from an order book method to a fully onchain method such as an AMM method or hyperliquid with its own chain, I think projects like Mira have a good chance of moving fully onchain. If Mira's in-house process is LLM-based computations, then there seems to be enough elements to apply zkML or opML, which are concepts from other AI projects that are "stepping on the blockchain." Of course, it will require tremendous advancements in zk technology and advancements in AI, such as model lightweighting. If the development of technology leads to a singularity where the 'utility that can be obtained through decentralization' is greater than the 'resource utility through centralization', I thought that it would be possible to get closer to a fully onchain deAI project that uses blockchain throughout the whole process and mass adoption. haha

Author: Happy Weekend Scof😊, ChainCatcher Editors: TB, ChainCatcher An end-to-end decentralised trading venue with CEX-level performance GTE (Global Token Exchange) is a decentralised trading platform incubated by MegaETH Labs, committed to building a decentralised trading platform, providing perpetual contract (perps) trading, spot token trading, and initial coin offering (TGE) and other functions. Unlike other trading platforms or issuance platforms, GTE is unique in its single validator node model, which is designed to prioritise performance and focus entirely on optimising trading performance on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). GTE not only includes its own automated market making (AMM) system for spot trading, but also integrates a central limit order book (CLOB) to improve the performance of perpetual contract trading, and is also equipped with an aggregator exchange to ensure that users can enjoy the best price in trading MegaETH assets. A unique way of issuing tokens GTE offers two different token issuance platforms: GTE Launchpad and GTE Takeoff. Among them, GTE Launchpad is aimed at established mature teams to help them complete the fair issuance of tokens; GTE Takeoff, on the other hand, is a permissionless platform for more free, decentralised token issuances, especially for more adventurous token promoters. Either way, all issuance projects will be directly connected to GTE's own AMM system, which is similar to the direction of Pump.fun, but GTE's goal is to better solve the problems in the existing market, such as token rush and asymmetry of internal and external interests, while providing more efficient transaction flow. This design is particularly appealing to traders who are more price-conscious, performance-oriented, and highly professional, while also providing a more engaging experience for MegaETH's target audience. In contrast, some products, such as memecoin trading and NFTs, have not fully realised the potential of the GTE platform. A balance between performance and decentralisation GTE competes with projects such as Hyperliquid in terms of transaction performance. Hyperliquid is currently the best platform of its kind, attracting a large number of users with its efficient perpetual contract trading experience, and its market capitalisation is still as high as $20 billion. Unlike Hyperliquid, GTE aims to achieve more efficient performance gains, although this approach may involve some compromises in decentralisation. However, as the success of projects such as Hyperliquid and Solana shows, many users can compromise on the balance between performance and decentralisation. GTE adopts a similar design philosophy to MegaETH, which is to centralise block production while keeping validators decentralised. Through the special requirements of node hardware, GTE hopes to achieve lower latency and higher transaction throughput than existing products. Challenges and prospects of GTE Despite the potential advantages of GTE in terms of latency, it still faces some challenges that need to be addressed. The first is how to ensure the continuous stability of transactions, and the second is how to effectively design incentive mechanisms to improve user experience. In addition, the platform needs to be better optimised in terms of user interface and the rapid launch of new tokens in order to achieve long-term success in the broader market, as Hyperliquid does. However, GTE's design architecture, performance optimisation, and strong financial backing still give it a place in the highly competitive blockchain trading market. At present, GTE has successfully completed three rounds of financing, with major investors including Robot Ventures, Wintermute, Maven11, Flow Trades and other well-known institutions, with a total of $10 million, including $2.5 million in Echo platform financing. The co-founder of the project is Enzo, and no further information has been disclosed at this time. While GTE's testnet is not yet open, users can join a waitlist waiting for the public launch of the MegaETH testnet. (This article is only about early-stage projects and is not intended as investment advice.) )